The question is often asked, "How can one individual stand alone against 'City Hall'?" After serious practice combined with continued faith, study, and prayer, our answer came:

1.Obtain, and study carefully, a copy of West's Annotated California Codes, Government Code, Title 2, Div. 3, Ch. 5 Administrative Adjudication sections 11500-11528. If you have difficulty understanding it, ask a lawyer to explain it. If the lawyer discourages you and tells you it does not apply to the letter, bill, ticket, or other accusation you received from the IRS, DMV, FTB, Licensing Agency or other ABC government administrative agency/officer, then find another lawyer, or a paralegal, or even a teacher of the English language. Find someone who can help you UNDERSTAND this legal procedure; not necessarily someone to do it for you. (For those living in other states, see #7 below.)

2.Upon receipt of the accusation, send the Agency Hearing Board a NOTICE OF DEFENSE (sec. 11506) and be sure to ask for a hearing. (Bender form 15.)

3.The Administrative Hearing is the place where you will put ON THE RECORD your Evidence of substantive Rights. This is the place where you enter your Recissions and Waivers and Claims and Declarations, etc., on the RECORD. You may also enter questions of Discovery such as "Where does the Agency have an Interest in Respondent (that's you) to convert his right to travel/contract into the privilege to drive/be employed?" or "What evidence does the Agency depend upon to show that Respondent is subject to the licensing requirements and state administrative police powers in this instant case?" or "Is a Tax Identification Number mandatory or voluntary and what section of the Code says that?" or "As I do not have a license, by what section of the Code does the Licensing Agency claim it may regulate Respondent?"

(Do not become angry with any answers you may receive, as all of this information is entered here for the Record.)

 4.If/When the Administrative Hearing Board rules against you, you may take their Decision for a review in the Superior Court of your County by a Petition for Writ of Mandate (CCP secs. 1085, 1086) to Review Administrative Decision (CCP sec. 1094.5) cost of bringing this Writ of Mandate is included in the Petition. There is no charge to file it.

5.If you are denied the Administrative Hearing, you have been denied due process of law (Gov't Code Sec. 11506) and you might want to file the Mandate for Review of the Administrative Decision (Bender form 35) and claim some damages.

6.If you followed the above instructions you may have eliminated any or all of the following: going to Justice Court, Municipal Court, Tax Court, losing your property, and even going to jail; AND you may be rewarded for being vigilant and claiming your Rights just by following the Forms. Be sure to read carefully the instructions following each Form, and Govt Code secs. 11500-11528.

7.Every State in the Union must have equivalent statutes and Forms. You legal researchers out there get busy and find your state's codes which are equivalent to Calif. Govt. Code 11500-11528 and the procedural code sections for the Review Mandate--Calif. CCP secs. 1085, 1086, and 1094,5, and the equivalent to Bender Form Numbers 15 and 35. Let the people in your state know the forms they can use to stand up and claim their Rights so that the agencies will get the message to do their job of regulating the business of the state and nothing more.

Maybe we should begin to entertain the possibility that we, the individual sovereigns, DID SOMETHING to change our sovereign status to that of a 14th Amendment subject who is in debt (the validity of which cannot be questioned).

We do have the right to contract (somehow) out of the jurisdiction of sovereignty secured (though not granted) by the Constitution; and maybe we did exercise that right to contract into a commercial status and abandoned our sovereign status.

We submit that we were registered at birth into an eleemosynary corporate estate which made us eligible to apply for benefits and privileges. Did we not make application for the benefits of the social security insurance policy and other benefits which are in the commercial jurisdiction?

REMEMBER: Commerce is a subject of the U.S. If you are registered in commerce, you are registered as a subject. Birth Certificates are registered in the U.S. Department of Commerce; ALSO, the commercial jurisdiction is the one that uses NOTES (which are evidences of debt) and not SUBSTANCE to pay debts. (For purposes of this discussion we will not address the validity of the NOTES or PROMISES TO PAY nor will we address the subject of discharge of debt in contrast to the extinguishment of debt. However, to discourage perpetual debt, always offer to pay debts with unborrowed substantive money, and afford those indebted the opportunity to do likewise.)

We at the Judge Roger Sherman Society have concluded that if an individual has sovereign status, he may simply BAR the state/legislative courts-for-subjects (see Art.1, sec.8, cl.9 & Art.3, sec.1, cl.1 U.S. Constitution) from exercising the jurisdiction of THEIR courts ("COURT-- the person and suit of the sovereign" Black's Law dictionary 3rd Ed. pg. 457) against another sovereign. They recognize that the law does not give them jurisdiction over another sovereign. But they HAVE jurisdiction over their subjects (those who signed in and showed a birth certificate).